They contains four items: positive care and attention opinions (“Worrying assists us to end problems subsequently”), beliefs on the uncontrollability and you will issues (“My personal alarming is actually risky for me personally”), cognitive ability (“I’ve nothing depend on inside my memories to possess conditions and you may labels”), general bad thinking (“Basically didn’t control a distressing believe, following it just happened, it will be my fault”), and you can cognitive mind-awareness (“I believe a great deal in the my personal opinion”). The fresh new metacognition survey is obtained in a good 4 area level away from 1 (“don’t agree”) in order to 4 (“concur considerably”) together with a great Chronbach’s alpha = .88. The newest metacognition survey has been utilized extensively during the low-systematic products such smokers and you may people [forty-two, 45]. A complete score try determined to form an index from metacognition for every new member.
This new Compulsive-Compulsive Collection is a 42-goods mind-declaration questionnaire, determining the seriousness of individuals obsessions and you may compulsions from OCD from inside the grownups . This new compulsive-obsessive list include eight subscales that come with laundry (“I wash my personal hands with greater regularity otherwise more than called for”), checking (“I go back into towns and cities so as that You will find not hurt someone”), doubting (“Even though I actually do some thing very carefully Personally i think it isn’t some right”), buying (“I have troubled in the event that anybody else features changed the way i keeps created my personal one thing”), obsessing (“I’ve found challenging to handle my personal view”), hoarding (“We gather one thing Really don’t you would like”), and you can neutralising (“Personally i think I need to recite particular number”). This catalog try scored to the a cuatro point Likert scale, from (“not at all”) to help you 4 (“extremely”) along with an excellent Chronbach’s leader = .88. An entire score try determined to create you to definitely score per participant associated with O-C attacks.
Techniques
Chances shot regarding college students took part in the analysis. Players was basically first of all given information regarding the research and given the ability to seek advice about it. Once providing concur, each participant considering group pointers, right after which was in fact offered brand new five forms into the a good counterbalanced buy to respond to during the their own go out. If fellow member complete he/she try thanked and debriefed. All material and procedures implemented the latest moral direction and procedures intricate from the American Emotional Connection and you can were checked and you can recognized by University regarding Hertfordshire ethics committee (Number:14149216).
Efficiency
Research is actually screened having shed philosophy, outliers and assumptions out of analytical investigation in advance of one study . Every details got appropriate values to own skewness and kurtosis without tall outliers. Bivariate correlations of the countless all the computed indexes found positive and you can extreme relationships among them (Desk step 1). The best connection was within spiders away from state and characteristic anxiety, with https://datingranking.net/escort-directory/north-las-vegas/ new connection ranging from nervousness susceptibility, metacognition and you may O-C symptoms.
Our first prediction was that metacognition and anxiety (state and trait) would be significant predictors of O-C symptoms. Consistent with our expectations all variables were associated to O-C symptoms in significant and positive correlations (all ps < .001) [24, 30, 33].
In order to investigate the relative importance of each of the computed index on the prediction of O-C symptoms all the indexes were used as simultaneous predictors of O-C symptoms in a multivariate regression analysis. Results revealed that metacognition was the best predictor of O-C symptoms (? = .41, p < .001), followed by trait anxiety (? = .21, p < .05), state anxiety (? = .16, p = .08), and anxiety sensitivity (? = .04, p = .63). The overall model resulted significant, R 2 = .49, F(4, 151) = , p < .001). Although previous research indicated that anxiety sensitivity is a good predictor of O-C symptoms , the inclusion of the other variables reduced its effect to a non-significant level.
